What is wrong with intelligent design?

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

What is wrong with intelligent design?

This article reviews two standard criticisms of creationism/intelligent design (ID)): it is unfalsifiable, and it is refuted by the many imperfect adaptations found in nature. Problems with both criticisms are discussed. A conception of testability is described that avoids the defects in Karl Popper's falsifiability criterion. Although ID comes in multiple forms, which call for different critic...

متن کامل

What is wrong with intelligent design?

While a great deal of abuse has been directed at intelligent design theory (ID), its starting point is a fact about biological organisms that cries out for explanation, namely “specified complexity” (SC). Advocates of ID deploy three kind of argument from specified complexity to the existence of a designer: an eliminative argument, an inductive argument, and an inference to the best explanation...

متن کامل

What is wrong with what is said?

The scientific flaws in medical research, especially as they relate to randomized controlled trials are rather uniform and the common denominator of such flaws is the attempt to prove, rather than falsify, the study hypothesis. This interactive educational exercise is an attempt to highlight these flaws in short scenarios.

متن کامل

The Quarterly Review of Biology WHAT IS WRONG WITH INTELLIGENT DESIGN?

This article reviews two standard criticisms of creationism/intelligent design (ID): it is unfalsifiable, and it is refuted by the many imperfect adaptations found in nature. Problems with both criticisms are discussed. A conception of testability is described that avoids the defects in Karl Popper’s falsifiability criterion. Although ID comes in multiple forms, which call for different critici...

متن کامل

What is wrong with SLASH ?

In an experiment featuring nonlinear optics, delayed choice and EPRtype correlations, the possibility of faster–than–light communication appears not totally implausible. Attempts are put forward and discussed to refute this claim. Quantum theory and special relativity theory are the cornerstones of today’s physical perception. Obviously their intrinsic consistency as well as the consistency of ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

سال: 2007

ISSN: 0020-7047,1572-8684

DOI: 10.1007/s11153-007-9112-2